Augos Factory / Proof / Food packer

Case study · Food & beverage

Two faults cost 392 hours a quarter. Now they cost 27.

A printer and a filler kept stopping a packing line for hours at a time. Nine months later, the same two faults barely register.

392 h
lost to printer and filler faults in quarter 1
27.2 h
lost to the same faults in quarter 4
11 min
average printer stop, down from almost six hours
0.9 h
lost to electrical filler faults in quarter 4, down from 141.6 h

The problem

A line that stopped more than it ran

The packing line was paid for 2,208 hours in its baseline quarter. Unplanned stops took 65.5% of that time, and only 19.2% turned into good output.

What the record suggested

Two faults dominated. The downstream printer stopped the line 36 times for 209.5 hours, nearly six hours a stop. Filler faults cost another 182.5 hours. Fix those two first, the costliest first.

Six hours a stop is the signature of a fault nobody can diagnose quickly.

The fix

Fixed in order of what they cost

Maintenance worked through the printer and the filler, starting with the costliest fault.

Three quarters later, with the same 2,208 paid hours, printer faults cost 15.6 hours. The printer still stopped 84 times, but each stop lasted about 11 minutes.

Electrical filler faults fell from 141.6 hours to 0.9. Mechanical filler faults fell from 40.9 hours to 10.7.

Holding the standard

Held, with the next fault already named

In the last two months on record, printer faults stayed under 6 hours a month: 5.4, then 3.8.

The record already shows the next fault to chase: product pick-up, at 45.5 hours in the latest month.

The stop record put a name and a cost on both faults, so they could be fixed in order of what they cost. It shows the next one before it grows.

Questions

This case, answered

Why did each printer stop take so long?

Nobody could diagnose the fault quickly, so each stop ran for hours. Once it was named and costed, it could be fixed. The printer still stops, but for about 11 minutes.

How were the two faults chosen?

By cost. Together they took 392 hours a quarter, more than anything else on the line.

What does this case leave out?

A rand value: the plant has not shared its sales values, so the case reports hours. Plant and product names are withheld.

Find losses like these on your own line.

Thirty minutes with a manufacturing specialist, on your own lines and products.

  • Every stop timed and given a reason
  • Read by your own team
  • Prices in rand, ex VAT

A manufacturing specialist replies within two business hours to set a 30-minute call.