Augos Factory / Industries / Steel and building materials

Steel processing, roll forming and building materials

The same coil change. Three sites. Three different times.

Slitting, cut-to-length, roll forming, pressing and kiln lines lose time in coil and tool changes. Augos Factory times each one against its standard and your own fastest.

From R4,950 per line per month, ex VAT

Each ring runs to 15 minutes. The blue arc is the site's typical best: the median change time for the product it changes over fastest.
An early Augos study · one anonymised steel processor, three sites · site, products and people removed.

2,934coil changes timed across three sites of one steel processorMeasured
54%of coil-change time ran above each site's own benchmarkMeasured
0integrations, PLC tags or IT projects
R4,950per line per month, ex VAT

Where steel and building-material lines lose time

Four losses this industry knows well.

A steel coil on a transfer car at a coil change, with the changeover crane's hook beside it and more coils waiting behind.
A coil on its transfer car at a coil change.

Coil and tool changes

Every change timed from last good part to first good part, per changeover reason.

Set-up and first-off checks

Run-up time and scrap on the first parts, counted against the job.

Material and crane waits

Waiting for a coil, a crane or a forklift, recorded as its own loss, with its root in the reason tree.

Kiln and press stops

Breakdowns timed from stop to restart, split into response and repair with maintenance calls.

An early Augos study · 2,934 coil changes at three sites

Every minute past the blue line is time the site has already beaten.

Measured4.6 minbetween the fastest and the slowest site's best coil change
Measured12.5×the spread at the least steady site, against the steadiest
Measured537.1 hof coil-change time past each site's own benchmark

An early Augos study · one anonymised steel processor, three sites, 2,934 coil changes · site, products and people removed.

Coil-change times by site

Measured · box shapes illustrative
Benchmark: the site's typical bestTime above the benchmarkMiddle half of changesAverage

An early Augos study · one anonymised steel processor, three sites, 2,934 coil changes. Benchmarks, averages, spread ratios and hours are from the study report; box and whisker shapes are illustrative. Site, products and people removed.

What the spread could be worth

Estimate what the time past the benchmark is worth.

The hours are measured. The rand figure is your own estimate: pick a value close to what an hour of net production earns your line.

An hour of net production, as examples. How to estimate it ›

Coil-change time above benchmark, your own estimate

Hours measured · example value

R966,780

537.1 hours above each site's own benchmark, at an example R1,800 an hour of net production

Slowest site · 286.7 h
R516,060
Fastest site · 175.5 h
R315,900
Steadiest site · 74.9 h
R134,820

Hours from the study report. The platform shows the hours; the rand figure is your own estimate at an example value. Time already spent is a measure of the gap, not money in the bank.

Where to start

Three sites, three different jobs.

1 · Slowest site

Settle the method

The most time past its benchmark, 286.7 hours, and changes scattered 12.5 times as widely as at the steadiest site. Check long stops logged as coil changes first.

Who acts: engineering, with standard work

2 · Fastest site

Repeat its own best

The quickest benchmark, 6.6 minutes, yet 72% of its change time ran past it. The fast method exists; it is not yet the norm on every shift.

Who acts: training, team by team

3 · Steadiest site

The reference process

Its coil changes vary the least, and only 40% of its change time ran past its own benchmark, the lowest of the three. Its way of working is the one to write down and carry across.

Who acts: group operations, across sites

The Augos Operator Terminal's job screen on a slitting line: the coil, job reference, OEE and rings for availability, performance and quality, with the shift's stops listed on the left

Built for the floor

Made for a heavy-industry floor.

The Augos Operator Terminal sits in a stainless-steel enclosure beside the operator. The sensor is sealed against dust and water.

304stainless-steel enclosure
IP65sealed terminal enclosure, by design
−20 to +50 °Coperating range, 5 to 95% humidity, non-condensing
IP67+count sensor, chosen for the floor

Recreated screen of the Augos Operator Terminal on demo data.

Questions

Steel and building materials, answered.

Will the sensor survive a heavy-industry floor?

The terminal sits in a sealed 304 stainless-steel enclosure designed to IP65, for −20 °C to +50 °C and 5 to 95% humidity, non-condensing. The count sensor is sealed to IP67 or better, chosen for the floor.

Can coil changes be compared across our sites?

Yes, when every site uses the same reason list and the same start and end points for a change. For multi-site groups ›

Do kilns and continuous lines fit?

Yes, where a sensor can see when product stops flowing.

See every coil change against its standard.

Thirty minutes with a manufacturing specialist: each change against standard, and the fastest your team has already done.

  • Every change timed
  • Standard and overrun split
  • Prices in rand, ex VAT

A manufacturing specialist replies within two business hours to set a 30-minute call.