Augos Factory / Proof / FMCG packing site

Case study · Food & beverage · South Africa

Death by a thousand interruptions

A packing site had an OEE of 26.5% and no obvious villain. There was no big breakdown to point at. The losses were 218,000 tiny stops, each too short to notice, all dumped into a single uncategorised bucket that hid the real story.

26.5%
Starting OEE
218,000
Interruptions, one bucket
Seconds
how long each interruption lasted, too short for the old tracking to record
Every one
timestamped, so the team knows where to look

A bad number with no explanation

The line's OEE sat at 26.5%, low enough to be alarming, and yet there was no obvious cause. The maintenance log was quiet. There had been no major breakdown, no long outage, nothing dramatic enough to explain why the line was producing at barely a quarter of its potential. By every account the line was "running fine". It simply wasn't producing.

When a line is losing that much time with nothing to point at, the losses are almost always small and frequent rather than large and rare. The problem is that the tracking in place could not see small and frequent.

Turning up the resolution

Augos captured the line's stops at a much finer resolution than the site's existing system. The result was stark: over the measured period the line had suffered 218,000 individual interruptions, short halts of seconds at a time (what standard OEE calls minor stops or micro-stops), each one previously invisible because it was too brief for the old tracking to register. Every one of them had been swept into a single uncategorised downtime bucket.

Why the bucket mattered

218,000 stops in one line item looks like an unsolvable mess. Augos timestamps every one, so you can see when they happen: by hour, shift, product and operator. That shows the team where to look. The why is found at the line.

From a mess to a to-do list

Seeing when the interruptions happened did the real work. It told the team where to look. The causes were then found at the line, by the plant's own engineers. That turned an intimidating, formless loss into an ordinary engineering backlog: fix the top cause and stops disappear in their tens of thousands.

The wider point is about measurement, not machinery. A line can be quietly losing three-quarters of its capacity to stops no one is recording. If the data can't see a two-second halt, it can't see the biggest loss on the floor, and the OEE number stays a mystery.

Questions

This case, answered

What is an interruption?

A very short stoppage, often seconds, where the line halts and restarts. Individually they are trivial; at scale they can be the single largest loss on a line, and coarse tracking never records them.

Why did they all land in one bucket?

The existing tracking recorded downtime at a resolution too coarse to see short stops, so anything that didn't fit a named category was swept into a single 'other' or uncategorised total.

How do you fix 218,000 stops?

You don't fix them one by one. Once you can see when they happen, the team knows where to look, and finds the causes at the line. Fixing those causes removes stops in their thousands.

Find losses like these on your own line.

Thirty minutes with a manufacturing specialist, on your own lines and products.

  • Every stop timed and given a reason
  • Read by your own team
  • Prices in rand, ex VAT

A manufacturing specialist replies within two business hours to set a 30-minute call.